In which I explain the many and varied reasons why I decided that my life would be happier outside of the Government Digital Service after 3+ years service.
This is definitely the first and probably the last time I will ever explain publicly why I chose to leave a job. I left the Government Digital Service in August 2015 and I’ve had few people ask why. It’s been long enough that I would hope any lingering unreasonable dissatisfaction would have dissipated and for the most part I was happy with the experience and would encourage anyone to do a tour of a few years helping out the Civil Service.
However, as with anyone leaving an organisation, I did it because I believed I would be happier somewhere else. That sounds negative, but in reality not every organisation is for everyone for all time. It’s OK to move on, so while this post is from a guy who chose to move, I hope it’s not taken as a criticism of many former colleagues or in fact a disincentive to join GDS.
I believe the idea of GDS is sound. The UK Civil Service has suffered in many areas, over many decades, from the belief that specialism is something to be contracted out in the vain hope that private industry will supply the skills and knowledge needed and act in the best interests of the Country. That’s laudable, but quite frankly bollocks. (I might swear again, sorry mum)
Private industry exists to make money. Pretty much the only benefit it brings to anyone working in the Civil Service is the outsourcing of risk. In-sourcing expertise is a great idea and I hope that the UK Civil Service continues to build and maintain in-house specialist knowledge and capability. I also hope they do it by adopting skills and methodology that is known to work elsewhere, so that they maximise the opportunities for people to enter and leave the service.
I used to be a “Web Operations” for GDS. That is probably the worst thought out job title anyone has ever created. It vaguely describes a practice area within the more general field of systems engineering or administration, but when you try to apply that to a person, it’s an ineffective job title, a rubbish description of what they do and leads to awful phrases like “I need a WebOps”.
I was technically employee number 2 in the Web Operations Team on GOV.UK, with a decade of system administration experience, some exposure to “Cloud”, but not much practical experience of Configuration Management (puppet) - but we managed to get by, we deployed a thing called GOV.UK with the help of some talented consultants and friends and I’m quite proud of it.
After a couple of years, I needed something different so I helped out with the ill-fated Rural Payment Agency project, where we tried to digitize the process of applying for subsidies by farmers (historically not particularly digital people). I think enough has been written about that project that I won’t bore you, but without exception the people were great, the aim was high, it just lacked a little on the execution side from the Rural Payments Agency (historically not a particularly digital organisation) and the scope creep killed it.
When GDS disengaged from that project, I then started on the Alpha of GOV.UK Pay which was fantastic, as I was a team of one, we were going to deploy on AWS and I could choose all the tooling, so I got a chance to use Ansible. Lovely team, great project, but by that time my heart wasn’t in it any more.
The “startup culture” under which GDS operates is pretty punishing. There is always something that needs to be done and often refactoring was secondary to new features. Bad choices were made for reasons of expediency and never revisited, because there was always a new feature needed.
I also don’t like some features which seem to be common in some “Agile” circles, but have little to do with being Agile. (I don’t believe the Agile Manifesto mandates them)
The “features is everything” culture lead to a complex and bloated system that was poorly executed. I have never worked on any project that maintained two separate database technologies (MySQL, PostgreSQL) for so long in parallel. This of course doesn’t include the MongoDB, Redis, Memcache, RabbitMQ instances, all of which have overlapping feature sets.
I’m a big fan of Dan McKinley’s “Choose Boring Technology” article and in it he discusses the merits of “optimizing globally” - if you can make do with a technology you have, even if the alternative is better in some way you should - and if you absolutely have to swap, you should do it quickly, cleanly and globally. We didn’t.
Promotion and Pay progression really really sucks in the Civil Service. I was fortunate to know this in advance, so I was careful to negotiate hard on my initial salary so that it was a rise on what I’d had previously and would cover any rises I would forego for the next three years.
To match industry salaries, everyone in GDS has an inflated “grade”. It’s not the only department in this situation (MHRA has a similar problem), but it does lead to some oddities. If you enter the Civil Service on a high salary, you’re effectively screwed for pay rises.
To give an example:
Civil Service Pay Rises are currently capped at “1% of the mid-point of the band” which means that before tax, your pay rise is about £500/yr or 0.6% - which is a less than inflation, so in real terms your pay drops every year.
I’m entirely aware that this (completely fictional) example is a stonking salary and people have to survive on a lot less, but still being worth less and less each year does grate a bit.
The civil service employs a box-ranking scheme where it expects you to be marked against the Civil Service Competency Framework (which is entirely keyed to generalists) and put into a box of basically doing great, doing OK and doing badly and they expect a certain percentage of people to be in each box, so you can’t all be doing great.
Pretty much every major organisation which did this (Yahoo, Microsoft) at any point had ditched the practise long before I joined the Civil Service. It’s an utterly crap and massively demotivating way to manage people. It should die, in a fire. It’s being widely trashed (search for “Stack Ranking”) and the Civil Service should abandon it and stop trying to measure 400,000 people against the same scale - it just doesn’t work.
I hope this hasn’t put you off joining the Civil Service. It’s a great place to work for a while. All the people are lovely.
It’s just the organisation that needs to change before I will go back. I’m sure it will and I’m sure I will, I just can’t say when.